Nuclear Risk Tracker
Nuclear risk tracker

How close are we to nuclear war?

The forecasting community puts the chance of a nuclear weapon being used in anger before 2027 at 2%. That's low, but experts agree the risk is the highest it has been since the Cold War.

Forecasts last updated

2%of 100%
Chance of nuclear usebefore 2027, Metaculus
85sto midnight
Doomsday Clockseconds to midnight, 2026

Before 2027

2%

Nuclear weapon used before 2027. Metaculus, the most reliable near-term figure.

Before 2030

5%

Nuclear weapon used before 2030. Metaculus community forecast.

Before 2035

25%

Nuclear weapon used before 2035. Risk adds up over longer horizons.

Betting market, frozen

22%

Polymarket's last price for 2026, before it pulled the market in March. Likely overstated.

Today's briefing

Risk elevated, no sign of imminent use

Forecasters see a low but elevated chance of nuclear use in the next year. Arms control is at a low point after New START expired in February, and tensions remain high after this year's US strikes on Iran. No nuclear-armed state has signalled imminent use.

Written daily by AI (Claude) from current news and the forecasts below, then published automatically. Sources: Metaculus nuclear detonation forecast.

Every forecast

Chance each event happens by the date shown. Metaculus figures refresh every hour.

EventByChanceSource
Any nuclear weapon used (non-test)Before 2027
2%
Metaculus
November 3, 2026
Any nuclear detonation in 2026 (market archived)End of 2026
22%
Polymarket
March 3, 2026
Any nuclear weapon used (non-test)Before 2030
5%
Metaculus
November 3, 2026
Any nuclear weapon used (non-test)Before 2035
25%
Metaculus
November 3, 2026
Catastrophe killing 10M+ (superforecasters)By 2045
1%
Forecasting Research Institute
October 28, 2024
Catastrophe killing 10M+ (nuclear experts)By 2045
5%
Forecasting Research Institute
October 28, 2024
Nuclear weapon used as an act of warBy 2050
25%
Metaculus
November 3, 2026
Global thermonuclear warBy 2070
11%
Metaculus
November 3, 2026

The clock keeps creeping

Seconds to midnight, set each January by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. It is symbolic, not a probability.

82848688909290s202390s202489s202585s2026

How to read this

Why the numbers differ so much.

Metaculus Hundreds of forecasters with strong track records. The best guide to near-term risk; it moves over weeks, not minutes.

Betting markets Tend to overprice disasters: a bet against the end of the world can't pay out if it happens. Polymarket's figure is frozen since it removed its market.

Expert surveys Cover a bigger event, 10 million or more deaths, over two decades. Experts are consistently more worried than superforecasters.

Who has the bomb

Estimated nuclear warheads, January 2026 (SIPRI Yearbook 2026). Bubble size shows arsenal size.

12,187warheads worldwide
86%held by the US and Russia
9nuclear-armed countries
  1. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia5,420
  2. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States5,042
  3. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China620
  4. ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France370
  5. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom225
  6. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India190
  7. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan170
  8. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel90
  9. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต North Korea60

Where you'd be safest, and most exposed

No place is safe in a large nuclear war. These rankings summarise published research on two things: who could still feed themselves through a nuclear winter, and where the bombs would most likely fall.

Most resilient

Ranked by food self-sufficiency in nuclear-winter models and distance from likely targets.

  1. Australia

    Grows far more food than it needs, mostly wheat, which copes relatively well with a cooler climate. Caveat: its US military ties could make it a target.

    Boyd & Wilson 2023; Xia et al. 2022
  2. New Zealand

    Nuclear-free, far from likely targets, and its food exports could feed the population several times over. Weak spot: it imports all its refined fuel.

    Boyd & Wilson 2023
  3. Argentina

    A major grain exporter that models find among the least affected by a global famine.

    Xia et al. 2022
  4. Iceland

    One of five island nations judged able to keep feeding itself through a nuclear winter.

    Boyd & Wilson 2023
  5. Uruguay

    Southern Hemisphere food producer that avoids mass starvation even in the worst modelled war.

    Xia et al. 2022
  6. Paraguay

    Large food surplus relative to population, far from any likely target.

    Xia et al. 2022
  7. Brazil

    Among the few countries modelled to avoid starvation in the most extreme scenario.

    Xia et al. 2022
  8. Solomon Islands

    Can feed itself and depends less on industry, so it would suffer less if global supply chains collapse.

    Boyd & Wilson 2023
  9. Vanuatu

    Food self-sufficient Pacific island, far from Northern Hemisphere fallout.

    Boyd & Wilson 2023
  10. Oman

    One of the few countries outside the Americas and Australasia modelled to avoid starvation in the worst case.

    Xia et al. 2022

Most exposed

Likely targets in a large war, plus the regions modelled to lose most of their food.

  1. US missile fields (Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming)

    Home to US land-based missiles, deliberately placed as a 'nuclear sponge' to draw an attacker's first strikes.

    Fast Company; Alex Wellerstein
  2. Washington, D.C.

    Seat of US government and military command, a near-certain target in any large war.

    Irwin Redlener, Columbia University
  3. Moscow

    Russia's political and military command centre.

    Capital of a nuclear-armed state
  4. New York City

    Largest US city and financial centre, on every expert list of likely city targets.

    Irwin Redlener, Columbia University
  5. Beijing

    China's capital and command centre, with China's arsenal growing fastest.

    Capital of a nuclear-armed state; SIPRI 2026
  6. London

    Capital of a nuclear-armed NATO member.

    Capital of a nuclear-armed state
  7. Paris

    Capital of a nuclear-armed NATO member.

    Capital of a nuclear-armed state
  8. Indiaโ€“Pakistan border region

    Delhi, Lahore and Islamabad would be at the centre of any South Asian nuclear war, the scenario studied most often after USโ€“Russia.

    Xia et al. 2022
  9. Korean Peninsula

    Seoul and Pyongyang sit next to North Korea's fast-growing arsenal.

    SIPRI 2026
  10. Northern farm belts (Russia, US Midwest, China)

    Even far from blasts, food production here could fall by up to 97% in a nuclear winter.

    Boyd & Wilson 2023

Close calls

The moments the world came nearest to nuclear war, and the turning points behind today's risk.

Nuclear use Crisis False alarm Arms control
  1. August 6, 1945
    Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    The only time nuclear weapons have been used in war. Both cities destroyed within three days.

  2. October 27, 1962
    Cuban Missile Crisis: Black Saturday

    A US spy plane is shot down over Cuba and a Soviet submarine, B-59, nearly fires a nuclear torpedo. Widely seen as the closest the world has come.

  3. September 26, 1983
    Petrov's false alarm

    Soviet satellites report US missiles inbound. Officer Stanislav Petrov judges it a malfunction and doesn't pass it up the chain. He was right.

  4. November 7, 1983
    Able Archer 83

    A realistic NATO nuclear exercise looks like cover for a real attack to Moscow, which puts nuclear-capable forces on alert.

  5. January 25, 1995
    The Norwegian rocket

    A research rocket studying the northern lights is read by Russian radar as a Trident missile. Yeltsin's nuclear briefcase is activated, the only known time.

  6. February 27, 2022
    Russia's nuclear forces on alert

    Days after invading Ukraine, Putin orders nuclear forces to a special state of readiness, reviving fears of escalation.

  7. February 5, 2026
    New START expires

    The last treaty limiting US and Russian nuclear arsenals ends without a replacement.

  8. February 28, 2026
    US strikes on Iran

    US airstrikes on Tehran and other Iranian cities push nuclear-risk forecasts and betting markets sharply higher.

One calm email a week

The forecasts, what moved them, and what it means. Plus an alert if the risk jumps.